From Toxic Traits to Toxic Workplaces: The Mediating Role of Abusive Supervision in the Link Between Supervisors' Dark Triad and Employee Cynicism, and Organizational Sustainable Performance
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22555/ijelcs.v10i2.1399Keywords:
Narcissistic Leadership, psychpathy, machiavellianism, abusive supervision, employee cynicism, organizational sustainability performanceAbstract
Dark triad leadership has been linked to drastic consequences globally. This study investigates the influence of supervisors' Dark Triad traits (narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy) on organizational sustainable performance (OSP) through abusive supervision and employee cynicism, with artificial intelligence (AI) adoption as a moderator. Drawing on Conservation of Resources (COR) theory and Social Exchange Theory (SET), data from 450 employees in Pakistani SMEs were analyzed using structural equation modeling. The study’s results reveal that supervisor narcissism and psychopathy significantly increase abusive supervision, while Machiavellianism unexpectedly reduces it. Abusive supervision triggers employee cynicism, which subsequently reduces OSP. The findings also illustrate that abusive supervision and employee cynicism sequentially mediate the effects of narcissism and psychopathy on OSP. AI adoption moderates the damaging impact of cynicism on OSP. Theoretical contributions include validating Dark Triad-driven serial mediation pathways in an understudied context and demonstrating AI’s moderating role in mitigating cynicism. Practical implications suggest psychometric screening for Dark Triad traits in leadership, AI-integrated transparency tools, and robust accountability mechanisms to curb abuse and foster sustainable performance.
References
Abugre, J. B., & Acquaah, M. (2022). A contextual study of co-worker relationship and turnover intentions: the mediating role of employee cynicism. African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 13(2), 219-235.
Agazu, B. G., Kero, C. A., & Debela, K. L. (2025). Transformational leadership and firm performance: a systematic literature review. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 14(1), 29.
Ahmed, A. K., Atta, M. H. R., El-Monshed, A. H., & Mohamed, A. I. (2024). The effect of toxic leadership on workplace deviance: the mediating effect of emotional exhaustion, and the moderating effect of organizational cynicism. BMC nursing, 23(1), 669.
Alsadaan, N., & Alqahtani, M. (2024). Toxic Leadership in Emergency Nurses: Assessing Abusive Supervision and Its Team?Level Impacts on Conflict Management and Organizational Commitment. Journal of Nursing Management, 2024(1), 4271602.
Balogun, A. G., Elisha, J. M., & Uye, E. E. (2025). Psychological Contract Breach, Abusive Supervision, and Turnover Intention among Nigerian Healthcare Workers: Examining the Mediating Role of Organizational Cynicism. Indonesian Psychological Research, 7(1), 1-16.
Bhattacharjee, A., & Sarkar, A. (2024). Abusive supervision: a systematic literature review. Management Review Quarterly, 74(1), 1-34.
Bhatti, S. H., Kiyani, S. K., Dust, S. B., & Zakariya, R. (2021). The impact of ethical leadership on project success: the mediating role of trust and knowledge sharing. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 14(4), 982-998.
Bingül, E., & Göncü-Köse, A. (2024). Moderating Effects of Dark Triad on the Relationships of Mobbing and Abusive Supervision with Outcomes. Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 40(2), 77-88.
Braun, S., Schyns, B., Zheng, Y., & Lord, R. G. (2024). When Vulnerable Narcissists Take the Lead: The Role of Internal Attribution of Failure and Shame for Abusive Supervision. Journal of business ethics, 1-19.
Carter, M. Z., Cole, M. S., Bernerth, J. B., Harms, P. D., Wilhau, A., & Palmer, J. C. (2024). Rotten apples in bad barrels: Psychopathy, counterproductive work behavior, and the role of social context. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 45(6), 837-854.
Chin, Y. S., Mohamad, A. A., & Lo, M. C. (2024). Harnessing the power of artificial intelligence (AI): a paradigm shift in HRM practices for employee sustainable performance. Global Knowledge, Memory and Communication.
De Bruin, R., & Finkelstein, L. M. (2023). Reactions from the dark side: how does the Dark Tetrad affect responses to daily abusive supervision today and tomorrow? The Journal of Psychology, 157(3), 160-191.
Ding, C., Su, M., Pei, J., Zhu, C. J., & Zhao, S. (2024). When and Why Negative Supervisor Gossip Yields Functional and Dysfunctional Consequences on Subordinate Interactive Behaviors. Journal of business ethics, 1-19.
Dionigi, A., Duradoni, M., & Vagnoli, L. (2022). Humor and the dark triad: Relationships among narcissism, Machiavellianism, psychopathy and comic styles. Personality and individual differences, 197, 111766.
Emmons, R. A. (1989). Exploring the relations between motives and traits: The case of narcissism. In Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions (pp. 32-44). Springer.
Fernandes, A., Duarte, M., & Basto, M. (2024). When Supervision is Abusive: What Explains it and What are the Consequences? Proceedings of The 19th European Conference on Management, Leadership and Governance,
Gao, Q., Zhang, K., Cao, Y., Li, J., Bian, R., & Wang, X.-H. (2024). The effect of negative workplace gossip about supervisor on workplace deviance and impression management: The mediating roles of anxiety and guilt. Journal of Business and Psychology, 39(2), 435-454.
Gauglitz, I. K., Schyns, B., Fehn, T., & Schütz, A. (2023). The dark side of leader narcissism: The relationship between leaders’ narcissistic rivalry and abusive supervision. Journal of business ethics, 185(1), 169-184.
Gazi, M. A. I., Rahman, M. K. H., Masud, A. A., Amin, M. B., Chaity, N. S., Senathirajah, A. R. b. S., & Abdullah, M. (2024). AI capability and sustainable performance: unveiling the mediating effects of organizational creativity and green innovation with knowledge sharing culture as a moderator. Sustainability, 16(17), 7466.
Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American sociological review, 161-178.
Greenslade?Yeats, J., Cooper?Thomas, H., Corner, P. D., & Morrison, R. (2024). A paradox?constitutive perspective of organizational gossip. International Journal of Management Reviews, 26(2), 187-210.
Gümü?ta?, C., & Karata? Gümü?ta?, N. (2025). How and for whom abusive supervision influences organizational citizenship behavior: the roles of burnout and workplace friendship. International Journal of Conflict Management, 36(1), 70-93.
Hoang, G., Luu, T. T., & Yang, M. (2025). A systematic literature review of authentic leadership in tourism and hospitality: A call for future research. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 66(1), 110-132.
Hobfoll, S. E. (2001). The influence of culture, community, and the nested?self in the stress process: Advancing conservation of resources theory. Applied psychology, 50(3), 337-421.
Jonason, P. K., & Webster, G. D. (2010). The dirty dozen: a concise measure of the dark triad. Psychological assessment, 22(2), 420.
Khan, A. K., Hameed, I., Quratulain, S., Arain, G. A., & Newman, A. (2023). How the supervisor's Machiavellianism results in abusive supervision: understanding the role of the supervisor's competitive worldviews and subordinate's performance. Personnel Review, 52(4), 992-1009.
Khan, A. N. (2025). Artificial intelligence and sustainable performance: role of organisational agility and environmental dynamism. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 37(5), 568-583.
Lartey, J. K. S., Almeida, S., & Paloyo, A. R. (2024). The controversial relationship between narcissistic leadership and voluntary work behaviours: a meta-analytic approach. Management Review Quarterly, 1-25.
Li, H., Huang, S., & Feng, Z. (2024). The complexity of Machiavellian leaders: how and when leader Machiavellianism impacts abusive supervision. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 1-31.
Liu, C., Zhu, L., Yuan, Y., Chen, X., & Liu, J. (2025). A bibliometric review of abusive supervision. Human Resource Management Review, 35(3), 101091.
Lount Jr, R. B., Choi, W., & Tepper, B. J. (2024). “Abuser” or “Tough Love” Boss?: The moderating role of leader performance in shaping the labels employees use in response to abusive supervision. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 183, 104339.
Marchant-Pérez, P., Leitão, J., & Nunes, A. (2024). Abusive Leadership: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Innovations for Healthcare and Wellbeing: Digital Technologies, Ecosystems and Entrepreneurship, 423-455.
Moin, M. F., & Khan, A. N. (2025). The determinants of abusive supervision. International Journal of Conflict Management, 36(2), 257-270.
Nevo, O., Nevo, B., Zehavi, A. D., & Milton, M. J. (1993). Gossip and counselling: The tendency to gossip and its relation to vocational interests. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 6(3), 229-238.
Paulhus, D. L., & Williams, K. M. (2002). The dark triad of personality: Narcissism, Machiavellianism, and psychopathy. Journal of research in personality, 36(6), 556-563.
Rus, D., Sleebos, E., & Wisse, B. (2025). Fear is the path to the dark side: the interplay of leader fear of power loss and leader Machiavellianism on abusive supervision. Journal of Managerial Psychology.
Shahzad, K., Naz, F., Iqbal, R., & Chaudhary, R. (2024). When despotic leadership is more detrimental for employee job outcomes? Role of individual-level power distance orientation. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance.
Sun, W., Dedahanov, A. T., Fayzullaev, A. K. u., & Abdurazzakov, O. S. (2022). Abusive supervision and employee voice: The roles of positive reappraisal and employee cynicism. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 927948.
Supatni, A. P., & Sunaryo, S. (2024). Exploring the research trend of cynicism in the workplace through bibliometric. International Research Journal of Economics and Management Studies IRJEMS, 3(1).
Szabó, Z. P., Diller, S. J., Czibor, A., Restás, P., Jonas, E., & Frey, D. (2023). “One of these things is not like the others”: The associations between dark triad personality traits, work attitudes, and work-related motivation. Personality and individual differences, 205, 112098.
Tepper, B. J. (2000). Consequences of abusive supervision. Academy of management journal, 43(2), 178-190.
Volmer, J., Koch, I. K., & Göritz, A. S. (2016). The bright and dark sides of leaders' dark triad traits: Effects on subordinates' career success and well-being. Personality and individual differences, 101, 413-418.
Webster, B. D., Fox, C. J., Scrimpshire, A. J., Smith, M. B., & Syed, I. (2025). Stroke My Ego, I Will Scratch Your Back: Employee Narcissism and Supervisor Supplication on LMX and OCB. Journal of Business and Psychology, 1-17.
Wei, W., Chen, H., Feng, J., & Li, J. (2023). Helpful or hurtful? A study on the behavior choice of bystanders in the context of abusive supervision. International Journal of Conflict Management, 34(3), 623-643.
Yao, Z., Luo, J., & Zhang, X. (2020). Gossip is a fearful thing: the impact of negative workplace gossip on knowledge hiding. Journal of Knowledge Management, 24(7), 1755-1775.
Zhong, R., Yu, L., Zhu, J., & Zhu, L. (2025). Combat poison with “poison”: Leader-targeted negative team gossip mitigates the detrimental team consequences of abusive supervision climate. Journal of Applied Psychology.
Zou, X., Chen, X., Chen, F., Luo, C., & Liu, H. (2020). The influence of negative workplace gossip on knowledge sharing: insight from the cognitive dissonance perspective. Sustainability, 12(8), 3282.
