The Review Process and Policy

No.

Review Process Step

Days

1

Initial review by Editor (Journal’s Scope + Plagiarism Check)

7

2

First Double-Blind Peer Review Process

15

3

Communicate Review Reports to authors for minor/major revision

7

4

Submission of the Revised version

20

5

Second Double-Blind Peer Review Process

15

6

Acceptance of paper (on successful submission of revised paper)

Or

Rejection of paper (on unsuccessful submission of revised paper  

7

 

Total days from submission to Acceptance

71
  • Paper is returned to authors if domain and quality does not meet the initial review done by the Editor in the first step.
  • Final decision of acceptance and rejection within 3 months.

Peer Review Policy

The journal operates a double-blind peer-review procedure. To make sure this, authors should submit the article without their particulars, such as authors' names, institutional affiliations, contact information, and references to authors' own works in order to conceal their identity. The particulars of reviewers are also kept anonymous from the author(s) for the double-blind peer-review procedure.

Only those manuscripts that have not been previously published or submitted to another journal are considered for evaluation.

The editor will conduct a preliminary evaluation of the manuscript for plagiarism using Turnitin, ensuring alignment with the journal’s scope. The overall similarity index must remain below 19%, and no individual source can exceed 5%. Furthermore, any AI-generated content must also contribute less than 19% to the total similarity.

The Editor conducts this evaluation without considering the ethnic origin, gender, citizenship, religious belief, or political philosophy of the authors.

A fair double-blind peer review process is employed for the selected manuscripts. The selected manuscripts are sent to at least two reviewers, (one national reviewer and one international reviewer) for evaluation, and the final publication decision is made by the Editor after considering the modifications made by the authors based on the reviewers' feedback.