Comparing Traditional Teaching Method and Experiential Teaching Method using Experimental Research
Keywords:
business communication, experiential learning, experimental research, traditional learningAbstract
The modern time is shaping a world of opportunities that has glorified the role and functions of multinational organizations across the globe. An individual has become a global citizen, who explores employment opportunities in different countries of the world. This has signified the importance of interpersonal skills that allow individuals to connect with people from different cultures. As a result, the role of business communication instructors has become vital because they impart the skills of communication among their students. For this, instructors’ sensitivity towards the teaching methods used in classrooms are of prime significance. These methods determine the interest level and motivation of students towards learning and acquisition of communication skills. Therefore, this study aims to compare experiential learning method and traditional learning method to explore which method inculcates and improves the communication skills of business administration students of a private sector university. The study was conducted in a quantitative paradigm using an experimental research design. The sample size comprised 60 BBA students from two different sections of business communication courses. The data were collected using a pretest and posttest. For the pretest, communication skills were imparted to both the groups using the traditional teaching method that heavily employed lecturing. For the posttest, the controlled group was taught using the same traditional teaching method while the treatment group was taught using the experiential learning method. Mean scores 20.46 & 19.90 with a significant value of 0.375 for the pretest established identical nature of both groups. Mean scores 27.80 & 30.36 with a significant value of .002 of posttest showed that the two groups under study had different identities in scores, which proved that experiential learning method improves students’ communication skills better than traditional communication skills.
References
Abrams, L. S. (2010). Sampling ‘hard to reach’ populations in qualitative research: The
case of incarcerated youth. Qualitative Social Work, 9(4), 536-550.
Andrews, J., Higson, H. (2008). Graduate employability, ‘soft skills’ versus ‘hard’ business
knowledge: A European study. Higher Education in Europe, 33(4), 411- 422.
Broughton, G., Brumfit, C., Pincas, A., & Wilde, R. D. (2002). Teaching English as a
foreign language. Routledge.
Chang, J., Lee, M., Ng, K.-L., & Moon, K.-L. (2003). Business simulation games: The
Hong Kong experience. Developments in Business Simulation and Experiential
Learning, 34, 367-376
Creswell, J.W. (1994). Research design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. London:
SAGE Publications.
Curtis, D. B., Winsor, J. L., & Stephens, R. D. (1989). National preferences in business and
communication education. Communication Education, 38, 6-15.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: Collier Books.
Hasselbring, T. S., Bransford, J., Goin, L., Goldman, S., Pellegrino, J., Sharp, D., &
Vye, N. (1994). Using media for developing mental models and anchoring
instruction. American Annals of the Deaf, 139(1), 36-45.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Education and Educational Development

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.















