Human Rights Education and Language Learning in Pakistan: An EFL Perspective

Authors

  • Tazanfal Tehseem University of Sargodha image/svg+xml
  • Zahra Bokhari University of Sargodha, Pakistan
  • Saba Zulfiqar University of Lahore, Pakistan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v7i2.143

Keywords:

critical linguistics, human rights, ideology, systemic functional linguistics, textbooks

Abstract

This paper explores the dissemination of human rights through English language learning in Pakistan and builds on the knowledge that contributes to the development of democratic educational outcomes. Textbook discourses have long been the domain of critical linguistics; critical linguists understand textbook discourse primarily as a language in the context of schooling while the discourse analysts understand such discourses as systems of knowledge and ideology. The question of how the learners are expected to engage with the subject knowledge is explored from two theoretical perspectives: linguistic analyses are executed using tools such as choice of pronouns, mood, and modality from Systemic Functional
Linguistics (Halliday et al., 2014), a social semiotic theory of language as a meaning potential, and reinterpreted according to the intercultural paradigm (Piller, 2010) to familiarize the ways interactants choose to build relations in the textbook narratives because in exploring interpersonal meanings it is very easy to focus on what is said and why. Additionally, the image analysis is done by representational analysis that of how images reflect ideologies (Kress & VanLeeuwen., 2006). The contributions of this study are of particular importance to make visible elements of interpersonal meaning-making which were explored in the context of cumulative knowledge building in humanities.

References

Becher, T., & Trowler, P. R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. (2nd ed.) Open University Press.

Bernstein, B. (1990). Class, codes and control, the structuring of pedagogic discourse. Routledge.

Cates, K. (1990). Teaching for a better world: Global issues in language education. The Language Teacher, 14(5), 3-5.

Davison, C. (2004). The contradictory culture of teacher-based assessment: ESL teacher assessment practices in Australian and Hong Kong secondary schools. Language Testing, 21(3), 305-334.

Flowers, N., Bernbaum, M., Rudelius-Palmer, K. & Tolman, J. (2000). The Human Rights Education Handbook: Effective Practices for Learning, Action and Change. The United States: Human Rights Resource Center, University of Minnesota.

Freebody, P. (2007). Literacy Education in School: Research perspectives from the past, for the future. Camberwell, Victoria.

Halliday, M. A. K. & Matthiessen, M. I. M. C. (2014). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. Arnold.

Herrera Torres, D. M. (2012). Children as subjects with rights in EFL textbooks. Colombian Applied Linguistics Journal, 14(1), 45-59.

Kress, G. & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design (2nd ed.). Routledge.

Kukovec, M. (2017). Human Rights Education in Foreign Language Learning. English Language Overseas Perspectives and Enquiries, 14(1), 13-24.

MacDonald, S. (1994). Professional academic writing in the Humanities and Social Sciences. Southern Illinois University Press.

Mahboob, A. (2009). English as an Islamic language: A case study of Pakistani English. World Englishes, 28(2), 175-189.

Mahboob, A. (2015). Identity management, language variation and English language textbooks: Focus on Pakistan. Language and Identity across Modes of Communication, 6, 153.

Maton, K. (2014). Knowledge and Knowers: Towards a realist sociology of education. Routledge.

Rolls, N. (2013). Literacy and social responsibility: Multiple perspectives [Book Review]. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 36(2), 226-229.

Schleppegrell, M. J. (2004). The language of schooling: A functional linguistics perspective. Lawrence Erlbaum.

Struthers, A. (2014). Human rights education: Educating about, through and for Human Rights. The International Journal of Human Rights, 19(1) 53–73. doi:10.1080/13642987.2014.986652.

Starkey, H. (2002). Democratic citizenship, languages, diversity and human rights. The Open University.

Totten, S., & Pedersen, J. (Eds.). (2011). Teaching and studying social issues: Major programs and approaches. Information Age Publishing.

Zolkos, M. (2006). How to recapture human rights within the political: Validating the discourse theory approach. Human Rights and Human Welfare, 6, 43-52

Downloads

Published

2020-10-29

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Tehseem, Tazanfal, Zahra Bokhari, and Saba Zulfiqar, trans. 2020. “Human Rights Education and Language Learning in Pakistan: An EFL Perspective”. Journal of Education and Educational Development 7 (2). https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v7i2.143.

Similar Articles

41-47 of 47

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.