Gender Disparity in Students’ Performance of Science and Mathematics: Evidence from Nationwide Study in Pakistan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v11i1.912Keywords:
Gender disparity, Gender-based performance, Science and Mathematics achievement, Gender difference across school systems, Large-scale studyAbstract
Gender disparity in science and mathematics performance is under constant exploration. In a complex education system, like Pakistan, studying the difference in isolation may not generate holistic understanding. Therefore, this paper investigates changes in trends of gender differences within public and private schools. Data were gathered from nationwide representative students (n=15,391) of elementary grades using SATs/MATS. The results of independent t-test and two-way-ANOVA revealed that girls significantly outperformed boys in Science; girls came at par in Mathematics. Gender and school system demonstrated significant interaction effect only in mathematics unveiling that girls can perform better/equal to boys in same school system.
References
AEPAM. (2018). Pakistan Education Statistics 2016-17. Pakistan. Accessible at http://library.aepam.edu.pk
Ahmad, S. (2022). Do schools, as they are, work? IED Blog https://www.aku.edu/iedpk/blog/pages/Post_Details.aspx?pid=37
Ahmed, M., Mahmood, T., Mhyuddin, M. S., & Ghuman, M. A. (2013). Evaluation of school effectiveness of secondary education system: Comparative view of public and private institutions of Pakistan. Journal of Educational and Social Research. https://doi.org/10.5901/jesr.2013.v4n3p121
Ajai, J. T., & Imoko, B. I. (2015). Gender differences in Mathematics achievement and retention scores: A case of problem-based learning method. International Journal of Research in Education and Science, 1(1), 45-50.
Akhter, N. (2017). Factors Affecting Parents' Inclination towards private school system in Pakistan. Journal of Elementary Education, 27(2), 49-69.
Ali, S., Ansari, A. N., Ahmed, M., Ahmed, Z. I., Siddique, N. S., Shaikh, N., Solangi, S., Khatri, M., & Lateef, T., (2023). Policy Analysis of Girls’ Primary School Completion in Rural Sindh: Root Causes and Policy Recommendations using IIEP Education Policy Toolbox: A case study. https://resources.norrag.org/resource/view/775/437
Andrabi, T., Das, J., & Khwaja, A. I. (2008). A dime a day: The possibilities and limits of private schooling in Pakistan. Comparative Education Review, 52(3), 329-355.
Anjum, G., & Godil, A. (2019). Fear of achievement among young women in urban Pakistan: A phenomenological analysis of fear of achievement (FOA). Cogent Social Sciences, 5(1), 1666620. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2019.1666620
Arora, A., Foy, P., Martin, M. O., & Mullis, I. V. S. (2012). TIMSS 2011: International results in Mathematics. Chestnut Hill: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center, Lynch School of Education, Boston College/ International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement.
Asante, K. (2010). Sex differences in Mathematics performance among senior high students in Ghana. Gender and Behaviour, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.4314/gab.v8i2.61947
ASER. (2020). Annual status of education report (ASER), 2019 Pakistan. Lahore: ASER Pakistan Secretariat, Idara-e-Taleem-o-Aagahi (ITA).
Aslam, M. (2009). Education gender gaps in Pakistan: Is the labor market to blame?. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 57(4), 747-784.
Aslam, M., & Kingdon, G. (2011). What can teachers do to raise pupil achievement? Economics of Education Review, 30, 559–574.
Aslam, M., and G.G. Kingdon. (2008). Gender and household education expenditure in Pakistan. Applied Economics 40 : 2573–91.
Awan, A. G., & Zia, A. (2015). Comparative Analysis of Public and Private Educational Institutions: A case study of District Vehari-Pakistan. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(16), 122-130.
Baye, A., & Monseur, C. (2016). Gender differences in variability and extreme scores in an international context. Large-scale Assessments in Education, 4, 1-16.
Beese, J., & Liang, X. (2010). Do resource matter? PISA Science achievement comparisons between students in the United States, Canada, and Finland. Improving Schools, 13(3), 266-279.
Bessudnov, A., & Makarov, A. (2015). School context and gender differences in mathematical performance among school graduates in Russia. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 25(1), 63-81.
Bhutta, S. M., Rizvi, N. F. (2022). Assessing teachers’ pedagogical practices and students’ learning outcomes in Science and Mathematics across primary and secondary school level: A nationwide study (2018-21). Aga Khan University, Institute for Educational Development, Karachi, Pakistan., 1-4.
Borgonovi, F., & Han, S. W. (2021). Gender disparities in fear of failure among 15-year-old students: The role of gender inequality, the organisation of schooling and economic conditions. Journal of adolescence, 86, 28-39.
Butt, I. H., & Dogar, A. H. (2014). Gender disparity in Mathematics achievement among the rural and urban high school students in Pakistan. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences, 34(1), 93-100.
Deepak Kumar & Pradeep Kumar Choudhury (2022): Do parental resources reduce the gender gap in math for primary school-going children? Evidence from India, Education 3-13, DOI: 10.1080/03004279.2022.2133546
Edgerton, J. D., Roberts, L. W., & Peter, T. (2012). Disparities in academic achievement: Assessing the role of habitus and practice. Social Indicators Research, 114(2), 303-322. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-012-0147-0
Else-Quest, N. M., Hyde, J. S., & Linn, M. C. (2010). Cross-national patterns of gender differences in Mathematics: a meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 136(1), 103.
Erturan, S., & Jansen, B. (2015). An investigation of boys' and girls’ emotional experience of Mathematics, their Mathematics performance, and the relation between these variables. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 30(4), 421-435.
Field, A. (2017). Discovering statistics using SPSS (5th ed.). London: Sage.
Fussy, D. S., Iddy, H., Amani, J., & Mkimbili, S. T. (2023). Girls’ participation in Science education: structural limitations and sustainable alternatives. International Journal of Science Education, 1-21.
Global Education Monitoring (GEM), Report (2020). A new generation: 25 years of efforts for gender equality in education. Gender Report.
Gonzales, P., Williams, T., Jocelyn, L., Roey, S., Kastberg, D., & Brenwald, S. (2008). Highlights from TIMSS 2007: Mathematics and Science achievement of US fourth-and eighth-grade students in an international context. NCES 2009-001. National Center for Education Statistics.
Government of Pakistan. (2016). National assessment reports 2016. Islamabad: National Education Assessment System (NEAS): Ministry of Federal Education & Professional Training.
Hyde, J. S., Fennema, E., & Lamon, S. J. (1990). Gender differences in Mathematics performance: a meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 107(2), 139.
Jamal, A. (2016). Why he won’t send his daughter to school—Barriers to girls’ education in northwest Pakistan. SAGE Open, 6(3), 215824401666379. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244016663798
Kane, J. M., & Mertz, J. E. (2012). Debunking myths about gender and Mathematics performance. Notices of the AMS, 59(1), 10-21.
Kang, H., Calabrese Barton, A., Tan, E., D Simpkins, S., Rhee, H. Y., & Turner, C. (2019). How do middle school girls of color develop STEM identities? Middle school girls’ participation in Science activities and identification with STEM careers. Science Education, 103(2), 418-439.
Keller, L., Preckel, F., Eccles, J. S., & Brunner, M. (2022). Top-performing math students in 82 countries: An integrative data analysis of gender differences in achievement, achievement profiles, and achievement motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 114(5), 966.
Khan, R. M. G. B., Chachar, G. B., & Abro, I. A. (2020). Mathematics Achievement of Grade VIII Students Based on International Standardized Test (TIMSS) in an Urban Context of Sindh, Pakistan. In 2020 3rd International Conference on Computing, Mathematics and Engineering Technologies (iCoMET) (pp. 1-4). IEEE.
Kingdon, G. G. (2020). The private schooling phenomenon in India: A review. The Journal of Development Studies, 56(10), 1795-1817.
Lau, K., & Lam, T. Y. (2017). Instructional practices and Science performance of 10 top-performing regions in PISA 2015. International Journal of Science Education, 39(15), 2128-2149. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1387947
Leder, G. C. (2019). Gender and Mathematics education: An overview. Compendium for early career researchers in Mathematics education, 289-308.
Lindberg, S. M., Hyde, J. S., Petersen, J. L., & Linn, M. C. (2010). New trends in gender and Mathematics performance: a meta-analysis. Psychological bulletin, 136(6), 1123.
Malacove, E. (2007). Effect of single-sex education on progress in GSCE. Oxford Review of Education, 33(2), 233-259. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/03054980701324610
Meinck, S., & Brese, F. (2019). Trends in gender gaps: Using 20 years of evidence from TIMSS. Large-Scale Assessments in Education, 7(1), 1-23.
Mohammadpour, E., & Shekarchizadeh, A. (2015). Mathematics achievement in high- and low- achieving secondary schools. Educational Psychology, 35(6), 689-713. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2013.864753
Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Gonzalez, E. J., & Chrostowski, S. J. (2004). TIMSS 2003 International Mathematics Report: Findings from IEA’s Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study at the Fourth and Eighth Grades. TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center. Boston College, 140 Commonwealth Avenue, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467.
Nath, S. R. (2012). Factors influencing primary students' learning achievement in Bangladesh. Research in Education, 88(1), 50-63. doi:https://doi.org/10.7227/RIE.88.1.5
Ndaji, F., Little, J., & Coe, R. (2016). A comparison of academic achievement in independent and state schools. Durham: Centre for Evaluation and Monitoring, Durham University.
NEMIS. (2019). Pakistan Education Statistics 2017-18. Retrieved from http://library.aepam.edu.pk/Books/Pakistan%20Education%20Statistics%202017-18.pdf
Nguyen, Q., & Raju, D. (2014). Private school participation in Pakistan. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, (6897).
Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Lindner, N. M., Devos, T., Ayala, A., ... & Greenwald, A. G. (2009). National differences in gender–Science stereotypes predict national sex differences in Science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(26), 10593-10597.
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. Paris: OECD. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en.
Ouma, C., & Nam, J. (2015). A meta-analysis of gender gap in student achievement in African countries. International Review of Public Administration, 20(1), 70-83.
Reilly, D., Neuman, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2015). Sex differences in Mathematics and Science achievement: A meta-analysis of national assessment of educational progress assessments. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107(3), 645-662. doi:10.1037/edu0000012
Reilly, D., Neumann, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2019). Gender differences in reading and writing achievement: Evidence from the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP). American Psychologist, 74(4), 445.
Saeed, M., Gondal, M. B., & Bushra. (2005). Assessing achievement of primary grader students and factors affecting achievement in Pakistan. International Journal of Educational Management, 19(6), 486-499. doi:DOI 10.1108/09513540510617436.
Sarouphim, K. M., & Chartouny, M. (2016). Mathematics education in Lebanon: Gender differences in attitudes and achievemnt. Educatonal Studies in Mathematics, 94(1), 55-68.
Shah, Z. A., Malik, M. A., & Akhtar, J. H. (2020). Exploring the Impact of Demographic Variables Gender, Parental Education and Locality on Science Achievement at 8th and 9th Grades. Bulletin of Education and Research, 42(1), 185-198.
Singh, A. (2014). Test score gaps between private and government sector students at school entry age in India. Oxford Review of Education, 40(1), 30-49. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2013.873529
Smith-Wooley, E., Pingault, J. B., Selzam, S., Rimfeld, K., Krapohl, K., Stumm-von, S., . . . Plomin, R. (2018). Differences in exam performance between pupils attending selective and non-selective schools mirror the genetic differences between them. Science of Learning, 3(3), 1-8. doi:doi:10.1038/s41539-018-0019-8.
Steegh, A. M., Höffler, T. N., Keller, M. M., & Parchmann, I. (2019). Gender differences in Mathematics and Science competitions: A systematic review. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 56(10), 1431-1460.
Thapa, A. (2015). Public and private school performance in Nepal: An analysis using the SLC examination. Education Economics, 23(1), 47-62. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645292.2012.738809
TIMSS. (2019). TIMSS 2019 International Results in Mathematics and Science. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA). https://timss2019.org/reports/wp-content/themes/timssandpirls/download-center/TIMSS-2019-Internationa
Tsui, M. (2007). Gender and Mathematics achievement in China and the United States. Gender Issue, 24(3), 1-11. doi: DOI 10.1007/s12147-007-9044-2.
Ullah, R., Ullah, H., & Allender, T. (2020). Girls Underperforming in Science: Evidence from Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Journal of Elementary Education, 29(2), 1-14.
Ullah, R., Ullah, H., & Bilal, M. (2020). Biological versus Feminists Perspectives on Girls' Underperformance in STEM Subjects in Pakistan. Liberal Arts and Social Sciences International Journal (LASSIJ), 4(1), 10-18.
UNESCO. (2020). Inclusion and education: all means all. Global Monitoring Report.
UNESCO. (2021, March). Education and Literacy by Country. Retrieved from UNESCO: http://uis.unesco.org/en/country/pk#slideoutmenu
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). (2022). Global education monitoring report 2022: gender report: deepening the debate on those still left behind.
Zuilkowski, S. S., Piper, B., Ong'ele, S., & Kiminza, O. (2018). Parents, quality, and school choice: Why parents in Nairobi choose low-cost private schools over public schools in Kenya’s free primary education era. Oxford Review of Education, 44(2), 258-274. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2017.1391084.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education and Educational Development
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
