Teachers’ Beliefs about Differentiated Instructions in Mixed Ability Classrooms: A Case of Time Limitation
Keywords:
differentiated instructions, mixed ability classrooms, teachers’ beliefs, multiple intelligenceAbstract
Students in today’s mixed ability classrooms come from diverse backgrounds with needs. In such a scenario, differentiated instructions are of prime importance for teachers to deal with in mixed ability classrooms. The teaching experiences and academic life mould perceptions of teachers which effects their teaching style; therefore, it is important to know teachers’ beliefs and perceptions regarding teaching in a mixed ability classroom at middle school level so as to guide educators and heads inside and outside the institution. For this study, quantitative research method was used to explore and understand the beliefs and perceptions of the teachers of middle schools regarding implementing differentiated instructions. The sample size included 120 teachers who were sent a survey questionnaire through online Google form and was constructed by customizing the questionnaire from Ballone and Czerniak (2001). The analysis of quantitative inquiry revealed that there is a positive association between teachers’ beliefs about their intentions and stakeholders’ expectations to implement differentiated instruction. It was highlighted that all stakeholders wanted teachers to implement differentiated strategies; however, the teachers were found to be short of planning and instructional time for differentiation.
References
Affholder, L. (2003). Differentiated instruction in inclusive elementary classrooms. Unpublished Ed.D Thesis: University of Kansas.
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Ballone, L., & Czerniak, C. M. (2001). Teachers’ beliefs about accomodating students’ learning styles in science classes. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 6(2), 1-41.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
Brimijoin, K., Conover, L. A., & Reynolds, T. (2003). Differentiating instruction in response to student readiness, interest, and learning profile in academically diverse classrooms: A review of literature. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 27(2), 119-145.
Cassidy, S., & Eachus, P. (2000). Learning style, academic belief systems, self-report student proficiency and academic achievement in higher education. Educational Psychology, 20(3), 307-322.
Chandler, J. (n.d.). History of learning styles. Retrieved from http://www.ehow.com/about_5381758_history-learning-styles.html.
Ehrman, M. E., Leaver, B. L., & Oxford, R. L. (2003). A brief overview of individual differences in second language learning. System, 31(3), 313-330.
E l l s b e rg , M., & Heise, L. (2005 ). Researching violenceagainst women- A practical guide for researchers and activists. Washington DC: World Health Organisation and PATH.
Fasko, D. (2001). An analysis of multiple intelligences theory and its use with the gifted and talented. Reoper Review, 23(3), 126-130.
Fierros, E. (2004). How multiple intelligences theory can guide teachers’ practices: Ensuring success for students with disabilities. Denver, CO: The National Institute for Urban
School Improvement.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. NY: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed. NY: Basic Books.
Gardner, H., & Hatch, T. (1989). Multiple intelligences go to school: Educational implications of the theory of multiple intelligences. Educational Researcher, 18(8), 4-10.
Gurgenidze, M. (2012). Methodology: Teaching mixed ability classes. GESJ: Education Science and Psychology, 1(20), 56-63.
Hall, T. (2002). Differentiated instruction. MA: National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum.
Hertberg-Davis, H., & Brighton, C. M. (2006). Support and sabotage: Principals’ influence on middle school teachers’ responses to differentiation. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(12), 90-102.
Joseph, S. (2013). Differentiated instruction: Experiences of pre-service and in-service trained teachers. Caribbean Curriculum, 20, 31-51.
Khursheed, F., & Ansari, U. (2012). Effects of innovativeagainst women- A practical guide for researchers and activists.
Washington DC: World Health Organisation and PATH. Fasko, D. (2001). An analysis of multiple intelligences theory and its use with the gifted and talented. Reoper Review, 23(3),126-130.
Fierros, E. (2004). How multiple intelligences theory can guide teachers’ practices: Ensuring success for students with disabilities. Denver, CO: The National Institute for Urban School Improvement.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. NY: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed. NY: Basic Books. Gardner, H., & Hatch, T. (1989). Multiple intelligences go to school: Educational implications of the theory of multiple intelligences. Educational Researcher, 18(8), 4-10.
Gurgenidze, M. (2012). Methodology: Teaching mixed ability classes. GESJ: Education Science and Psychology, 1(20), 56- 63.
Hall, T. (2002). Differentiated instruction. MA: National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum.
Hertberg-Davis, H., & Brighton, C. M. (2006). Support and sabotage: Principals’ influence on middle school teachers’
responses to differentiation. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(12), 90-102. Joseph, S. (2013). Differentiated instruction: Experiences of pre-service and in-service trained teachers. Caribbean Curriculum, 20, 31-51.
Khursheed, F., & Ansari, U. (2012). Effects of innovative against women- A practical guide for researchers and activists.
Washington DC: World Health Organisation and PATH. Fasko, D. (2001). An analysis of multiple intelligences theory and its use with the gifted and talented. Reoper Review, 23(3),
-130.
Fierros, E. (2004). How multiple intelligences theory can guide teachers’ practices: Ensuring success for students with disabilities. Denver, CO: The National Institute for Urban
School Improvement.
Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. NY: Basic Books.
Gardner, H. (1999). Intelligence reframed. NY: Basic Books.
Gardner, H., & Hatch, T. (1989). Multiple intelligences go to school: Educational implications of the theory of multiple intelligences. Educational Researcher, 18(8), 4-10.
Gurgenidze, M. (2012). Methodology: Teaching mixed ability classes. GESJ: Education Science and Psychology, 1(20), 56-63.
Hall, T. (2002). Differentiated instruction. MA: National Center on Accessing the General Curriculum.
Hertberg-Davis, H., & Brighton, C. M. (2006). Support and sabotage: Principals’ influence on middle school teachers’ responses to differentiation. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 17(12), 90-102.
Joseph, S. (2013). Differentiated instruction: Experiences of pre-service and in-service trained teachers. Caribbean
Curriculum, 20, 31-51. Khursheed, F., & Ansari, U. (2012). Effects of innovative teaching strategies on students’ performance. Global Journal of Human Social science Linguistics & Education, 12(10), 46-54.
Malik, S., & Janjua, F. (2011). Learning styles and teaching strategies: Creating a balance. Language in India, 11, 268-278.
Marshall, M. (1996). Sampling for qualitative research. Family Practice, 13(6), 522-525.
N e s p o r, J . (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 18, 197-206.
P a j a r e s , M . ( 1 9 9 2 ) . Te a c h e r ’s b e l i e f s a n d e d u c a t i o n a l
research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.
Pedersen, S., & Liu, M. (2003). Teachers’ beliefs about issues in the implementation of a student-centered learning environment. ETR&D, 51(2), 57-76.
Retting, M. (2005). Using the multiple intelligences to enhance the instruction for young children and children with disabilities. Early Childhood Education Journal, 32(4), 255-259.
Shah, J. (2008). Potential of mixed ability groups in educational institutions. The Dialogue, 3(1), 123-129.
Subban, P. (2006). Differentiated instruction: A research basis. International Education Journal, 7(7), 935-947.
To m l i n s o n , C . , & A l l a n , S . ( 2 0 0 0 ) . L e a d e r s h i p f o r differentiated schools and clasrooms. VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Tomlinson, C. A. (2001). Grading for success. Educational Leadership, 58(6), 12-15.
Tomlinson, C. (1999). The differentiated classroom: Responding to the needs of all learners. VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
Tomlinson, C. (1995). Deciding to differentiate instruction in the middle school: One school’s journey. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39(2), 77-114.
Torff, B. (2011). Teacher beliefs shape learning for all students. Kappan, 93(3), 21-23.
Umer, S., & Siddiqui, J. A. (2013). Improving trends of teaching methods used in the concept schools of Karachi : An Evaluative study. Educational Research International, 2(2), 146-154.
Va l i a n d e , A . , K y r i a k i d e s , L . , & K o u t s e l i n i , M . ( 2 0 11 ) . Investigating the impact of differentiated instruction in mixed ability classrooms: Its impact on the quality and equity dimen-sions of education effectiveness. Proceedings from International Congress for School Effectivesness and Improvement. Cyprus: ICSEI .
Vantassel-Baska, J., & Stambaugh, T. (2005). Challenges and possibilities for gifted learners in the regular classroom. Theory into Practice, 44(3), 211-217.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Education and Educational Development
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
