Engagement of School Leadership in Teachers’ Continuous Professional Development: A Case Study

Authors

  • Shirin Nooruddin
  • Shelina Bhamani

Keywords:

continuous professional development, school leadership, student achievement, teachers

Abstract

Teachers in the recent fast transforming technological era are required to regularly upgrade their knowledge, skills and attitudes to meet the needs of the 21st century learners & learning. This study explores the engagement of the school leaders in continuous professional development (CPD) by using a case study method. An elite school was selected as a sample case considering its recognition of CPD models and its constructive implications on learning. Two school leaders consisting of school headmistress and CPD convenor were selected using a purposive sampling method. The data were collected using an in-depth interview strategy and having a semi structured interview guide that could allow subjective detailed questioning and responses. Also, researchers own observations of CPD programmes provided relevant data for the study. The data analysis revealed that school leaders pursue CPD in a very systemic and process-oriented manner. The process starts from exploring individual teachers’ needs to providing them with avenues to upgrade their teaching with timely support and monitoring. This study synthesizes the findings and present essential characteristics of effective professional development. Strategies for policy makers, school leadership, school administrators and teachers to engage in continuous, relevant and contextualized professional development endeavours are discussed.

References

Beare, H., Caldwell, B. J., & Millikan, R. H. (2018). Creating an excellent school: Some

new management techniques. Routledge.

Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (2007). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to

theory and practice. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

Bredeson, P. V. (2000). The school principal’s role in teacher professional

development. Journal of in-service education, 26(2), 385-401.

Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. W. (1995). Policies that support professional

development in an era of reform. Phi delta kappan, 76(8), 597-604.

Day, C. (2009). Capacity building through layered leadership: Sustaining the turnaround.

In Distributed leadership (pp. 121-137). Springer, Dordrecht.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand

Oaks, CA: Sage.

DiPaola, M., & Wagner, C. A. (2018). Improving instruction through supervision, evaluation,

and professional development. Scottsdale: Information Age Publishing.

Dunne, F., Nave, B., & Lewis, A. (2000). Critical friends groups: Teachers helping teachers

to improve student learning. Phi Delta Kappan, 28(4), 31-37.

Elmore, R. F. (2004). School reform from the inside out: Policy, practice, and performance.

Harvard Education Press. 8 Story Street First Floor, Cambridge, MA 02138.

Feiman-Nemser, S. (2012). Teachers as learners. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University

Press.

Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What

makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of

teachers. American educational research journal, 38(4), 915-945.

Halai, A. (2007). Status of teachers and teaching: Conclusions, implications and

recommendations. Retrieved from http://ecommons.aku.edu/cgi/viewcontent.

cgi?article=1086&context=book_chapters

Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every

school, New York, NY: Teachers College Press.

King, M. B., & Newmann, F. M. (2000). Will teacher learning advance school goals?. Phi

Delta Kappan, 81(8), 576.

Leithwood, K. A., Jantzi, D., & Steinbach, R. (1999). Changing Leadership for Changing

Times. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Leithwood, K., Patten, S., & Jantzi, D. (2010). Testing a conception of how school leadership

influences student learning. Educational Administration Quarterly, 46(5), 671-

Levine, A. (2006), Educating School Teachers. Washington, DC: The Education School

Project

McDonald, L. (2005). Teacher education, training and experience: Knowing what, how,

when, why and with. New Zealand Annual Review of Education, 14, 131-151.

Moos, L., Johansson, O., & Day, C., (2011). How school principals sustain success over

time: International perspectives, 14. Netherlands: Springer.

Patton, K., Parker, M., & Tannehill, D. (2015). Helping teachers help themselves:

Professional development that makes a difference. NASSP Bulletin, 99(1), 26-42.

Poekert, P. (2011). The pedagogy of facilitation: Teacher inquiry as professional development

in a Florida elementary school. Professional Development in Education, 37, 19-38.

Sergiovanni, T. J. (2000). The lifeworld of leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Sparks, D. (2005). Leading for results: Transforming teaching, learning, and relationships

in schools. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Strahan, D. (2003). Promoting a collaborative professional culture in three elementary

schools that have beaten the odds. The Elementary School Journal, 104(2), 127-

Supovitz, J. A., & Turner, H. M. (2000). The effects of professional development on

science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science

Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science

Teaching, 37(9), 963-980.

Thoonen, E. E., Sleegers, P. J., Oort, F. J., & Peetsma, T. T. (2012). Building school-wide

capacity for improvement: The role of leadership, school organizational conditions,

and teacher factors. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(4), 441-460.

Vetter, A. (2012). Teachers as architects of transformation: The change process of an

elementary-school teacher in a practitioner research group. Teacher Education

Quarterly, 39(1), 27-49.

Villegas-Reimers, E. (2003). Teacher professional development: An international review of

the literature. Paris: International Institute for Educational Planning.

Weiss, I. R., & Pasley, J. D. (2006). Scaling Up Instructional Improvement through Teacher

Professional Development: Insights from the Local Systemic Change Initiative.

CPRE Policy Briefs. RB-44. Consortium for Policy Research in Education.

Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Yukl, G. A. (2002). Leadership in Organizations. (Fifth Edition.) Upper Saddle River, NJ,

Prentice-Hall.

Downloads

Published

2020-09-02

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Shirin Nooruddin, and Shelina Bhamani, trans. 2020. “Engagement of School Leadership in Teachers’ Continuous Professional Development: A Case Study”. Journal of Education and Educational Development 6 (1): 95-110. https://journals.iobm.edu.pk/index.php/joeed/article/view/86.

Similar Articles

21-30 of 166

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)