Digital Education Interventions and University Students' Academic Performance Amid the COVID-19 Pandemic: Faculty Members’ Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.22555/joeed.v11i2.1083Keywords:
digital education, faculty members’ perspective, satisfaction of faculty members, post graduate-level scholars, tertiary educationAbstract
The aim of this study was to document the university faculty members’ views related to digital education during the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequently its influence on students' academic performance, encountered obstacles, and recognized prospects. A concurrent triangulation strategy by employing (QUAN+QUAL) mixed method design was used in this research. A survey was conducted to solicit perspectives of 242 university faculty members in six public sector universities selected through a stratified random sampling technique to ensure representation of geographical regions and gender. Survey focussed on ascertaining faculty members’ readiness, institutional preparedness, and difficulties of online mode of delivery. Survey was followed by qualitative data collection in the form of narrations of feelings, personal experiences, challenges faced and suggestions to make online mode more effective. Data were analysed by computing descriptive statistics, mean response values of responses. The study found that faculty members expressed concerns about their readiness and satisfaction with online learning. They utilized various communication methods and assessment strategies, highlighting their adaptability. Key challenges included time management, internet connectivity, and technical issues. Achieving success in online programs necessitates reliable internet connectivity, adept time management skills, and mitigation of power disruptions Gender did not significantly affect gadget accessibility, understanding of online classes, or preferences for future online education. In conclusion, faculty members faced challenges with readiness, time management, and internet connectivity during the shift to online education but showed adaptability through diverse communication and assessment methods. To enhance digital education, institutions should improve internet infrastructure, offer time management training, and address technical issues. Gender did not significantly impact access to technology or preferences for online learning.
References
Allen, I. E., & Seaman, J. (2013). Changing course: Ten years of tracking online education in the United States. Sloan Consortium. PO Box 1238, Newburyport, MA 01950.. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED541571.pdf
Al Lily, A. E., Alhazmi, A. A., Abunasser, F. M., Buarki, H. J., Gomaa, A. A. S. E., Al Hanandeh, A. M., Elayyan, S. R., Alghamdi, A. M., Almufeez, K. A., Aldoghmi, M. A., Al Mohsen, N. A., Mohamed Shahpo, S. M., Ben-Motreb, K. S., Al-Abdullatif, A. M., Bukhamseen, A. M., Aldoughan, E. A., Almustafa, S. S., Alsubaie, M. A., Alqhtani, M. H., ... Amira, M. S. (2021). Covidian education: An enquiry into Arab culture. Technology in Society, 66, 101673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2021.101673Lee, X., & Chen, Y. (2021). Comprehensive Examination of Digital Education Interventions. Educational Research Quarterly, 25(4), 375-390.
Aucejo, E. M., French, J., Araya, M. P. U., and Zafar, B. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on student experiences and expectations: evidence from a survey. J. Public Econ. 191:104271. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2020.104271
Baloran, E. T. (2020). Knowledge, attitudes, anxiety, and coping strategies of students during COVID-19 pandemic. J. Loss Trauma 25, 635–642. doi: 10. 1080/15325024.2020.1769300
Bates, A. W. (2019). Teaching in a Digital Age: Guidelines for Designing Teaching and Learning. BCcampus.
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37-46.
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.
DiMaggio, P. (2004). Digital inequality: From unequal access to differentiated use. Social inequality/Russell Sage Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.eszter.com/research/c05-digitalinequality.html
ElSaheli-Elhage, R. (2021). Access to students and parents and levels of preparedness of educators during the COVID-19 emergency transition to e-learning. Int. J. Stud. Educ. 3, 61–69. doi: 10.46328/ijonse.35
Figueiredo, R., Dias, A.L., & Sousa, M.J. (2024). Digital technologies adopted by universities to support entrepreneurial students’ spin-offs. International Journal of Education Economics and Development, 15(1/2), 195–219.
Gupta, M. M., Jankie, S., Pancholi, S. S., Talukdar, D., Sahu, P. K., & Sa, B. (2020). Asynchronous Environment Assessment: A Pertinent Option for Medical and Allied Health Profession Education During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Education Sciences, 10(12), 352. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10120352
Hodges, C. B., Moore, S., Lockee, B. B., Trust, T., & Bond, M. A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Retrieved from https://www.scirp.org/reference/referencespapers?referenceid=2775840
Khan, F., and Vuopala, E. (2019). Digital competence assessment across generations: a finnish sample using the Digcomp framework. Int. J. Digit. Lit. Digit. Competence 10, 15–28. doi: 10.4018/IJDLDC.2019040102
Millar, S. K., Spencer, K., Stewart, T., and Dong, M. (2021). Learning curves in COVID-19: student strategies in the ‘new normal’? Front. Educ. 6:641262. doi: 10.3389/feduc.2021.641262
Pelikan, E. R., Korlat, S., Reiter, J., Holzer, J., Mayerhofer, M., Schober, B., et al. (2021). Distance learning in higher education during COVID-19: The role of basic psychological needs and intrinsic motivation for persistence and procrastination – a multi-country study. PLOS ONE, 16(10), e0257346. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0257346
Selwyn, N. (2020). The Digital Shift: A New Normal in Higher Education? Post Digital Science and Education, 2(3), 678-681.
Schleicher, A. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on education: Insights from education at a glance 2020. OECD Publishing.
Spector, M., & Morel, G. (2022). Foundations of educational technology: Integrative approaches and interdisciplinary perspectives (3rd ed.). Routledge. Retrieved from https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/mono/10.4324/9781003268406
Son, C., Hegde, S., Smith, A., Wang, X., & Sasangohar, F. (2020). The Impact of COVID-19 on Student Mental Health. Journal of Student Affairs Research and Practice, 22(9), 253-255. Retrieved from https://doaj.org/article/11f1655c02d0434c815ced0194cbc64e
Tang, C. M., and Chaw, L. Y. (2016). Digital literacy: a prerequisite for effective learning in a blended learning environment? Electron. J. Elearn. 14, 54–65
Tasso, A. F., Hisli Sahin, N., & San Roman, G. J. (2021). COVID-19 disruption on college students: Academic and socioemotional implications. Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy, 13(1), 9-15.
UNESCO. (2021). Education: From Disruption to Recovery. Retrieved from https://www.unesco.org/en/covid-19/education-response
UNESCO, (2020). COVID-19 educational disruption and response.
UNESCO. (2020). Education in a Post-COVID World: Nine Ideas for Public Action. International Commission on the Futures of Education.
Wilson, S., Khalayleh, A., Baloch, I., & Kaye, T. (2022). Desk Review of Technology-Facilitated Learning in Pakistan: A Review to Guide Future Development of the Technology-Facilitated Learning Space in Pakistan. https://doi.org/10.53832/edtechhub.0071.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Education and Educational Development
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
