Enduring Resilience of Capitalist Power: The Role of Capitalist Education as a Technology of Governance
Keywords:
capitalism, capitalist education, freedom, socialism, subjectivityAbstract
Capitalism has experienced several crises since its emergence but its present global dominance apparently remains unassailable. This paper argues that capitalism’s resilience is grounded in the systemic hegemony of capitalist individuality—an individuality, committed to freedom as an ultimate end and seeking abundance in this world. It has been argued that the successful manufacturing of capitalist subjectivity is significantly dependent on the inculcation of capitalist values to the subject of capital through capitalist education. Section one focuses on freedom as capitalism’s telos and sketches the historical emergence of capitalist subjectivity formed by processes of capitalist governance. Section two investigates the formational role of capitalist education as a technology of capitalist governance. It analyzes capitalist education as a means for the construction of capitalist individuality. Section three argues that capitalism’s main antagonists, especially Marxist socialism, cannot effectively challenge capitalist hegemony in the lifeworld or at the level of the state because they (i.e. main antagonists) endorse freedom (the core capitalist value) as an ultimate end in itself. Socialism does not propose to alter the subjectivity of an individual that the capitalist education constructs.References
Bauman, Z. (1983). Freedom. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press
Berlin, I. (2002). Liberty, Incorporating Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Boltanski, L. and Chiapello, E. (2007). The new spirit of capitalism. London: Verso
Clarke, S. (1981). The foundations of structuralism: A critique of Levi- Strauss and the Structuralist movement. Sussex: The Harvester Press
Donald, J. (1992). Detrimental education: Schooling, population, ulture and the regulation of liberty. London: Verso
Dryzek, J. S. (2004). Democratic political theory. In G. F. Gaus & C. Kukathas (eds.) Handbook of political theory. (pp. 143-154) London: Sage Publications
Fromm, E. (2013). Man for himself: An inquiry into the psychology of ethics. New York: Open Road Integrated Media
Gellner, E. (1983). Nations and nationalism. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Harvey, D. (1992). The condition of postmodernity: An inquiry into the origins of cultural change. Cambridge/MA: Blackwell
Harvey, D. (2014). Seventeen contradictions and the end of capitalism. New York: Oxford University Press
Hayek, F. A. (1979). Law, legislation and liberty: A new testament of the liberal principles of justice and political economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Held, D. (1997). Introduction to critical theory: Horkheimer to Habermas. Cambridge: Polity Press
Imre, R. & Griffiths, T. (2013). Mass education, global capital and the world: The theoretical lenses of Istvan Meszaros and Immanuel Wallerstein. New York: Macmillan
Sarup, M. (1988). An introductory guide to post-structuralism and postmodernism. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf
Moore, B. (Jr.) (1969). Social origins of dictatorship and democracy. Harmondsworth: Allen Lane
Rose, N. & Miller, P. (1992) Political power beyond the state: Problematic of government. British Journal of Sociology, 43, 172-205.
Tawney, R. (1949). Religion and the rise of capitalism. Harmordsworth: Penguin.
Upchurch, M. (2015). The Internet, social media and the work place. International Socialism, 141,119-135.
Watson, N. (2011). Postmodernism and life styles. In S. Sim (ed.) The Routledge Companion to Postmodernism. (pp. 62-72) London: Routledge
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Education and Educational Development
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
