Language Ideologies in a Business Institute: A Case Study of Linguistic and Socio-Cultural Realities
Keywords:
dialectical-relation, entextualization, interdisciplinary, language ideologies, semiosis, dialectical-relation,, entextualization, interdisciplinary, language ideologies, semiosisAbstract
This case study explored the English language related ideologies of different management groups and student representatives at a business school of Karachi, Pakistan. The study tried to bring an insider’s perspective to the causes of certain language ideologies prevalent in the business school’s social structure, and the role language played in power relations between the main actors of the community. For this purpose, a sample of four research participants from each of the focussed management cadres was selected for study. Analysis of semi-structured interviews, administered on the participants, was done using Fairclough’s (2009) dialectical-relational approach of critical discourse analysis (CDA). The study suggested the prevalence of certain language ideologies that were manifested and latent in the discourses of the participants. These deeply rooted beliefs were predominantly patterned by centering authorities: language became a means for those in power to sustain their hegemony and maintain social stratification in society. Functionally, English played a stratifying role, and also was found to be extensively perceived as a commodity, a product that is to be acquired or attained. The study realised this social wrong of inequity and divide in a particular community, and on the basis of the findings, recommends a reorganizing of social structures into those of more inclusive and democratic ones for the operationalizing of equality and fairness in social practices.References
Fairlough, N. (2009). A dialectical relational approach to critical discourse analysis in social research. Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis. London: Sage.
Lantolf, J. P. (2002). Sociocultural theory and second language acquisition Handbook of Applied Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Sherman, I., & Strubell. M. (2013). Multilingualism in companies: An introduction. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 6. 511-514. Retrieved from http: // ds.org10.1080/01434632.2013.807269
Sinclair, J., & Coulthard. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse.Oxford: Oxford University Press
Silverstein, M. (2006). Pragmatic indexing In Encyclopedia of language and linguistios, 6, 14-17
Silverstein. M (2004). Cultural concepts and the language culture nexus.Current Anthropology, 45, 621-652
Silverstein, M. (2003). Indexical order and the dialects of social life. Language and Communication, 23 (3), 193-229.
Silverstein, M. (1998). Contemporary transformations of local linguistic communities. Anrun/ Review of Anthropology, 27, 401-426.
Silverstein. M. (1996). The secret life of texts. In M. Silverstein & G Urban (Eds.). Natural Histories of Discourse. (PP. $1-105).Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Silverstein, M. (1979). Language structure and linguistic ideology. In R Clyne. W. F. Hanks & C. Hofbauer (Eds), The elements: A pararession on linguistic units and levels (pp.193-247)Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society
Tolle fion. J. W. (1909). Language ideology and language education.The Fourth International Conference on Language and Development, Vietnam.
"Woolard. K. A. (1992). Language ideology: Issues and approaches Pregratics. 2(3). 235-249
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2020 Journal of Education and Educational Development

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.















